On
December 18th 2014, IKEA, the world's largest furniture
retailer, opened its first Korean branch in Gwangmyeong, Gyeonggi Province.
The store is 25,759 square-meters (approximately 277,267 square-feet)
in size and it is accessible via train
and three inter-city express highways.
It
would appear that IKEA's business is booming. So much so that the
THREE
inter-city express highways that lead to IKEA are congested with cars
– all of them customers who want to buy their next furniture item
from IKEA.
Apparently,
doing well in business is not always a good thing. A little over two
weeks after IKEA opened its doors to the public, the Gwangmyeong
Municipal City has demanded that IKEA come up with a “dramatic
breakthrough” by January 7th
2015 to resolve the problem of the congested roads. The municipal
government threatened that if IKEA fails to come up with a solution
by that date, the government would withdraw the temporary approval
that it gave to IKEA to operate in its city, thus forcing IKEA to
shut its doors starting on January 15th
2015.
Image Source |
The
Gwangmyeong Municipal City is also pressing the central government to
have IKEA registered as a large-scale discount mall, which is
currently registered as a mall specializing in furniture. This
registration change would force IKEA
to shut
its doors twice a month on weekends.
Never
mind the fact that the Seoul High Court already ruled that that
particular regulation was unlawful
because “it was difficult to judge if the rules actually helped
smaller retailers while limiting consumers' choice at the same time.”
What
is the government proposing that IKEA does? Should IKEA stop being a
furniture retailer for a few years and re-brand itself as a
construction company that specializes in road expansion? Or should it
be a railroad company that focuses on adding and updating Korea's
railway system? Or should it be forced to expand its already huge
parking lot, which can house up to 2,000 vehicles?
Or
should IKEA be forced to raise its prices? That way, consumers will
just stop going to IKEA. Oh, wait. IKEA was already investigated
by the Fair Trade Commission for “charging South Korean
customers more than it charges buyers in other countries” even
before it opened!
Image Source |
President
Park Geun-hye can wax poetic about transforming Korea into a creative
economy until her face turns blue. The reality that is Korea's
economy says that the government's rhetoric is just that. Considering
the latest attack on IKEA, the Seoul Metropolitan Government's
persecution
of Uber, Korea's ridiculous
tariffs on agricultural imports, Korea's inability to overturn
its anachronistic
internet laws, Koreans' overall mercantile mindset, and many other illiberal and anti-globalization
tendencies, it is hardly surprising that half
of all foreign firms based in Korea plan on leaving Korea sooner
rather
than later.
Charles
de Gaulle was purported to have once said, “Brazil is the
country of the future... and always will be.” Though I am not sure
if Charles de Gaulle really did say it, regardless of the authenticity
of the source, I cannot think of a more curse-like compliment than
that. After all, it is another way of saying that an entire country
is forever
destined never to fulfill its huge potential.
Unless
there is a real structural economic reform and a genuine change in
the Korean people's attitudes about free trade, and soon, there is a
good chance that that epithet will not apply only to Brazil.
Image Source |
Great analysis... way to stifle business. I wonder if what the response would be if Samsung decided to open a furniture/home goods store that had the same "issues". Hmmm... Also reminds me of the uproar over Uber by the Korean taxi drivers.
ReplyDeleteThank you.
DeleteExcellent article on Korea's protectionist economic policies and corresponding mindset. And well done for calling Park Geun Hye out on her
ReplyDelete- evidently - vacuous words, i hope you don't end up in court for doing so. Incidentally, what are IKEA supposed to do, make the roads wider or build another highway.
Sharp and succinct and precise.
ReplyDeleteWhat Ikea is supposed to do is stop being a successful foreign firm stealing money and jobs from Koreans, you dirty, filthy, disgusting foreigners, taking advantage of the pure and innocent Koreans and their good nature.
ReplyDeleteShame on all non-Koreans!
you sucking Korean.
DeleteGood piece. Well done.
ReplyDeleteThank you, Rob.
DeleteI don't think I realized just how nuts the whole Ikea situation was until I read your piece. Kudos, John.
ReplyDeleteIkea Korea should have built or funded construction of distant parking lots and trams similar to how airports do. How could the local planners and road enginneers have NOT anticipated such impact? Was this rshed through just so cash flow from a prized source could commence? Licals need the roads, too.
ReplyDeleteI realize Korea is short on space, but that is FARMABLE space. Companies can build where crops cannot be grown. Problem is that many iconic brands want to be visible from the road and own their own parking lots. Trams and distant parking planned beforehand would likely have alleviated or obviated this problem. The parking might have been terraced or insde rock or in the open on shared, multipurpose land. I will consult a Naver or Google maps view...
Hey, I like this write up. Will share today for sure!
ReplyDeleteFair Trade does have a place in society. Ask Microsoft and Google and Apple. Consistency is a different issue. Should not be confused about that.
ReplyDeleteCausing massive traffic congestion is a problem. And up to Ikea to fix since they are causing it. Or the government could have a rigorous application procedure that would have cost quite a bit to Ikea. Or government can charge Ikea to get it fixed and Ikea would have more to pay. Its reasonable to be burdened to find a fix and should not be up to the local tax payers to pay for it while Ikea profits and obviously blundered in the planning.
Whether the closing of 2 days a month helps or not is open to debate. But a compromise process is required. In many countries permits for such large stores to decimate local businesses are not even allowed. Perspective is lacking in this piece.
While taxi system has its flaws offering a different flawed system does not make it obvious it should operate without regulations.
One sided arguments are just that. Half of the story.
Great article John!
ReplyDelete