WARNING: The following blog post contains a lot of spoilers. If you have not yet seen Mad Max: Fury Road and wish to do so without having the plot given away, then do not read this.
Image Source |
I
had never seen any of the original Mad Max movies. I knew that they
existed but for some reason, I was never interested in watching any
of them. I would have also ignored Mad
Max: Fury Road had
it not been for the hubbub that was generated by a Men Rights' group
that claimed that the movie was
“a
feminist piece of propaganda posing as a guy flick.”
So
I went to watch Mad
Max: Fury Road the other day
and it was amazing. The cars looked like it might have come out of Henry Ford's most feverish nightmares, the music was in-your-face, the sets were
over-the-top, the action scene was breathtaking and kept me on the
edge of my seat, Tom
Hardy's Max did not sound as ridiculous as his Bane's voice (it
was still a little ridiculous), Charlize
Theron can do no wrong, and there was actually a story in the
middle of all that! I thought the cherry on top of the whole movie was an extra
who played a flame-thrower electric guitar on top of
a moving stereo-car.
Image Source |
However,
having a one-track mind, while watching the movie, I could not help
but be drawn to the world's economic system.
The
movie's antagonist, Immortan Joe (who was played by Hugh
Keays-Byrne who
apparently was in the original Mad Max movie) is a diseased old man
and the tyrannical cult leader of a desert tribe.
Presumably
as a result of the nuclear war that destroyed Earth's mighty
civilizations, his back is covered in boils. He hides his back from
being seen by everyone else using a plastic body armor, which
actually has what looks like military ribbons painted onto the chest
plate. He also hides his face throughout the whole movie behind a
wicked looking mask. He also promises Valhalla for his soldiers who martyr
themselves for him (amazing how despite the fact that almost everyone has very funny sounding names, Valhalla's name doesn't change at all).
Whereas
Immortan Joe's subjects look like they're dying of thirst, he lives in his
mountain-lair, which only a select few are allowed to enter – those
select few being his sons and his harem of slave-wives. There is plenty of clean water that is pumped from
underground and the water is used to grow fresh green vegetables. He
occasionally releases the mountain's valve system and allows water to
fall onto his subjects for a precious few seconds; after which he
admonishes his subjects not to become addicted to water lest they
become angry at its absence.
During
the movie, it is revealed that he considers his slave-wives and the
children they bear him to be his property. Some of his slave-wives
whom he no longer uses to breed have another job – being milked.
Yes, Immortan Joe literally milks his women dry.
Tyrant.
Cultist. Slaver. Hypocrite. Liar. Immortan Joe
does not possess a single redeeming quality.
That IS a wicked looking mask though. Image Source |
While
I watched the movie, however, it struck me that Immortan Joe was running a
rentier
state, which is a state that accumulates revenue through the
exporting of natural resources rather than through taxation. To be specific, there are
several characteristics that have to be met in order for a society to
be considered a rentier state.
- Revenues are paid to the governments in the form of rent.
- Revenues are directly accrued by the state.
- Revenues must be accumulated via exports.
- A significant portion of the state's wealth must come from this revenue.
Judging
from the scenes in the movie, Immortan Joe did not tax his people.
For all intents and purposes, there seemed nothing worth taxing. The
same is true of rentier states. As rentier states accumulate their
wealth from natural resources, rentier governments have very little
incentive to institute extractive institutions such as a tax agency
or other ancillary bureaucracies that gather information about their
subjects. Of course, this is not to say that rentier states do not
gather information about their subjects at all. After all, even
rentier states have to carry out the census. However, for most
rentier states, patronage works far more effectively than legal
institutions.
That
is why rentier states (such as Brunei, the country that I was born
in) tend to be omnipresent in the lives of their citizens vis-à-vis religion.
Immortan
Joe's rentier state was certainly an exaggerated and over-the-top
version of the real thing. I don't know if the director, George
Miller, actually set out to depict an exaggerated rentier state but regardless
of his intent, he did a remarkable job doing so.
Image Source |
Now
let's jump to the end of the movie. At the end, Immortan Joe's dead
body is brought back to his city, where he is quickly set upon and
mutilated by his former subjects. Immortan Joe's only remaining son
is a deformed midget who now fears for his life. The bulk of his army
is either dead or stranded in hostile territory somewhere in the
desert. More importantly, his wives, who are led by the battered but
alive Imperator Furiosa (played by Charlize Theron) are finally free
from his iron grip.
Right
before the movie ends, however, Immortan Joe's former slave-wives,
the ones whom he milked, happily release the mountain's water valves
and allow the long-suffering subjects to finally drink to their
hearts' content.
From
an action movie's point of view, this was a great ending. A tyrant
is dead, people are free, and everyone lives
happily-ever-after. Down with the hateful patriarchy! Long live the
loving matriarchy!
Image Source |
From
an economist's point of view, however, there remain unanswered
questions. There is no doubt that Immortan Joe was an evil man, that
his regime was tyrannical, and that his belief in his right to own
his women and children is a perversion of property
rights. But what happens when that water, which Immortan Joe
guarded so zealously, is just given to anyone who wants it?
After
all, one would think that fresh drinking water is a very valuable,
rare, and finite commodity in a post-nuclear apocalyptic world. If
all of those pitiful people who understandably and rationally want to
drink as much water as possible are allowed to do so, would that not
eventually lead to a quick depletion of the water supply and thus be
contrary to the best interests of the whole group? In other words,
wouldn't this be the perfect example of the Tragedy
of the Commons?
In
order to ensure that everyone survives, would the new matriarchy
establish a socialist utopia where everyone is given just the right
amount of water that each person needs? If that happens, then one is
immediately reminded of Friedrich
Hayek's seminal book The Road to Serfdom
where he warned that government control of economic decision-making
through central planning inevitably results in tyranny. Will the
matriarchy eventually become as evil as the patriarchy it deposed?
Image Source |
Alternatively,
would the new matriarchy establish a form of currency so that
individuals can create a rudimentary market and allow market forces
to decide how much water can be consumed and by whom?
We
will never know. The movie simply ended far too soon.
I give Mad Max: Fury Road four-and-a-half out of five stars.
I give Mad Max: Fury Road four-and-a-half out of five stars.
Great review, and it tackles the movie from an angle that many people likely won't consider. I knew nothing about rentier states before reading your post, so I'm happy to report that I've now learned something new. Strangely enough, I felt some vague unease about the water question as well: the thought was only a fleeting one, but I did have to wonder just how much water was available to the denizens of The Citadel, and at what rate it could be pumped out of the ground. (Pumping is apparently done via slave labor, so that's another aspect of Citadel life that will have to change under the new, benevolent[?] matriarchy.)
ReplyDeleteFor what it's worth, my own review is now up.
Whether or not the movie had a "pro-matriarchal" message:
ReplyDeleteI think it didn't despite some surface appearances otherwise.
(1) Matriarchy is not exactly portrayed glowingly. Recall that the Amazon-like women's tribe is actually no different from any of the other groups around in its violence and brutality, including the use of deception to lure and kill unsuspecting men.
(2) Constant "patriarchal" overtones. The movie's central and inescapable message is that life is a struggle -- courage, honor, bravery, and mortal combat in defense of land and group resources is called for. This is a patriarchal message as we traditionally understand what patriarchy connotes.