What
is this thing that politicians call “will of the people?”
I
had earlier
predicted that the ruling Saenuri Party would lose the July-30
by-elections. Ruling parties almost never win in by-elections.
However, the Saenuri Party has surprised everyone by having won a
super-majority in the National Assembly, including a seat in the
South Jeolla province, which has been a liberal stronghold for
decades. The Saenuri Party now holds 158
out of 300 seats in Korea's unicameral legislature.
Image Source |
But
does this electoral win mean that President Park or Saenuri lawmakers
have gained a mandate of some sort? Only 32.9 percent of eligible
voters turned out to vote in the by-elections.
To
quote a line from a
TV show that I like, it's true that decisions
are made by those who show up. And to the victor goes the spoils.
But a mandate? To put it mildly, that seems like a stretch.
As
for the New Politics Alliance for Democracy (NPAD) Party, with its
two co-chairmen Kim
Han-gil and Ahn Cheol-soo having all but officially given up
their roles as party leaders, the party leadership has fallen onto
the shoulders of Park
Young-sun. Due to her party's diminishing
popularity, in her very first press conference as de facto party
chief, she pledged
“to do her utmost to rebuild the largest opposition party by
winning the hearts and minds of the people, saying that the NPAD
'failed to honor their will.'”
However,
what neither Saenuri nor NPAD lawmakers seems to understand is that
there is no such thing as “the People.” As much as politicians
may wish to simplify everything into quantifiable polls, it does not
change the fact that though there are millions of individuals who all
have different wants, needs, and priorities; this ridiculous concept
of a single blob-like People is actually non-existent.
So
what the hell do politicians mean when they talk about “the will of
the People?”
Start small and local. Image Source |
However,
let's say for the sake of argument that there is such a thing as “the
People” and let's say that they have Borg-like
characteristics and all have a collective mind.
Is
it a good idea to obey their every whim? Yes, one of the central
tenets of democratic republicanism is majority rule. But has no one
in the National Assembly ever even heard of Tocqueville?
His book “Democracy in America,” details the perils of democracy
by pointing out the dangers of majoritarianism and mediocrity, and
that the people in their ignorance tend to meekly obey despots that
are disguised as democratically elected leaders.
Or
have they read Tocqueville but decided to embrace all the things that
he warned against?
More
than majority rule, the most important thing about a stable
democratic republic is the absolute importance of the rule of law.
And the rule of law requires principles. It requires sober and
rational thought. It requires a system of morals and ethics.
What
it most certainly does not require is gross and unthinking populism.
Image Source |
No comments:
Post a Comment